引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览次   下载 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
Comparison on hydrocarbon generation kinetic models
WANG Min1,2, LU Shuang fang2, DONG Qi2, XUE Hai tao2, HUANG Li ming3
(1.Earth and Space Sciences Institute, Peking University, Beijing 100871,China;2.Earth Science Institute, Northeast Petroleum University,Daqing 163318,China;3.Heilongjiang Zhongliang Biochemical Energy Resources (Zhaodong) Company Limited, Zhaodong 151100, China)
Abstract:
Different kinetic models including overall reaction model, normal distribution model, Weibull distribution model and discrete distribution model were established, and kinetic parameters were optimized based on systematic research of hydrocarbon generation kinetics experiment for twenty three source rocks. Then the optimized results and hydrocarbon generation kinetic characteristics of different type kerogen were compared. The results show that Gaussian distribution model has the worst fitting effect, followed by overall reaction model and Weibull distribution model, and the discrete distribution model has the best fitting effect. Apparent activation energy increases gradually with the pre exponential factors increasing, and the apparent activation energy of type II2 III kerogen is larger than that of type I, and that of type II1 is the smallest. It is recommend the parallel first order kinetic model with a discrete distribution activation energies be used when the hydrocarbon generation kinetic method is applied to appraise oil gas resources and to study hydrocarbon generation kinetic characteristics and the isotope fractionation kinetics.
Key words:  kinetic model  kinetic parameters  apparent activation energy  pre exponential factor